Implementation Plan: Checklist Data Layer
Branch: 001-checklist-data-layer | Date: 2026-03-22 | Spec: /specs/001-checklist-data-layer/spec.mdInput: Feature specification from /specs/001-checklist-data-layer/spec.md
Summary
Implement the core database models for the camply smart poller: User, UniqueTarget, UserScan, and ScanResult. This layer enables de-duplicated polling by tracking unique campground/date combinations and associating them with individual user preferences.
Technical Context
Language/Version: Python 3.12 Primary Dependencies: SQLAlchemy 2.0 (Mapped/mapped_column), Alembic, Pydantic v2 Storage: PostgreSQL (with JSONB support for filters) Testing: pytest (unit tests for models and constraints) Target Platform: Dockerized Backend Project Type: Web Service (Backend Data Layer) Performance Goals: Sub-millisecond lookup for unique targets via indexed hashes. Constraints: Composite primary keys for provider-sourced entities; SHA256 hashing for de-duplication. Scale/Scope: Initial data layer to support Phase 1 MVP.
Constitution Check
GATE: Must pass before Phase 0 research. Re-check after Phase 1 design.
- Reliability & Precision: Does the unique hashing ensure no duplicate API calls? (Yes, via SHA256 constraints).
- Type Safety: Are all models using SQLAlchemy 2.0 Mapped types? (Yes).
- Automated Verification: Is there a plan for unit tests and migrations? (Yes).
- Separation of Concerns: Is this strictly in
backend/packages/db? (Yes).
Project Structure
Documentation (this feature)
specs/001-checklist-data-layer/
├── spec.md # Feature specification
├── plan.md # This file
├── research.md # Phase 0 output
├── data-model.md # Phase 1 output
├── quickstart.md # Phase 1 output
└── checklists/
└── requirements.md # Quality checklistSource Code (repository root)
backend/
└── packages/
└── db/
└── db/
└── models/
├── users.py
├── unique_targets.py
├── user_scans.py
└── scan_results.pyStructure Decision: Models will be added to the existing backend/packages/db package, following the established pattern of one file per major entity.
Complexity Tracking
| Violation | Why Needed | Simpler Alternative Rejected Because |
|---|---|---|
| None | N/A | N/A |